|
Undoubtedly there are vested interests on all sides that
can spin an argument either way. In the case of steam air
decoke, many of the costs are hidden, with further likely
to be consequential at a later date. Pigging Companies will
inevitably make commercial sales pitches based on real or
promised financial gains.
So,
salesmanship to one side…………what is
the real picture on costs?
When looking commercially at the respective procedures of
pig and steam air decoking, costs may be separated into two
composite elements of short term pure & visible
costs, as well as hidden & consequential
costs. With Steam Air Decoking it may be recognised
there are opportunity costs within those refineries in the
developed World where traditional skills and practices have
been originally trained and well maintained over many years.
Many Steam Air Decoking costs can be invisibly
absorbed. Steam can be seen as a free by-product, and fuel
gas costs can be obscured through easy allocation to Process.
The absence of an external physical payment can deceive budgetary
management into seeing Steam Air Decoking as a cost free exercise.
If there’s no invoice, and no cheque to be written,
then it must be free!
Although mindful of all these reasonable points,
cost identification of Steam Air Decoking remains difficult,
and there will inevitably be much variation from Country to
Country. In short term pure and visible cost terms,
it seems that a pigging decoke may be approximately twice
the cost of an internal steam air decoke.
However, for the purposes of a helpful commercial
example, we might take a four pass fired heater, typically
a delayed coker or visbreaker, containing a lineal total of 8,000
tube feet.
Steam Air Decoking hidden & consequential costs
often relate closely to factors of timing, and the losses
caused by downtime and tube damage. Downtime is the easier
to quantify with the value in operation of a DCU represented
by the often quoted figure of $20,000 per hour. In consideration
of downtime duration, the pig decoke wins handsomely every
time.
It is therefore a critical
exercise to compare the duration of decoking, as follows:
| STEAM AIR DECOKING |
|
DECOKING WITH SCRAPER PIGS |
| ELEMENTS OF PROCEDURE |
DURATION |
|
ELEMENTS OF PROCEDURE |
DURATION |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Flush out &
cool down |
10 hours |
|
Flush out &
cool down |
10 hours |
| Swing elbows -
steam connection |
4 hours |
|
Swing elbows -
launcher installations |
4 hours |
| DECOKING |
48 hours |
|
DECOKING (including one changeover) |
30 hours |
| Cool down |
8 hours |
|
Swing elbows -
process connection |
4 hours |
| Swing elbows -
process connection |
4 hours |
|
RETURN TO SERVICE |
|
| RETURN TO SERVICE |
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL TIME TAKEN
- OIL TO OIL |
74 hours |
|
TOTAL TIME TAKEN
- OIL TO OIL |
48 hours |
| Costs for Pig Decoke - |
Contractor charge estimate:
|
€30,000 - €60,000 |
| |
Other costs – mechanical
attendance only |
|
| Costs for Steam Air Decoke - |
internal identified cost estimate: |
€17,500 - €25,000 |
| |
Add downtime – 26 hours:
|
€250,000 - €500,000 |
| |
Additional safety costs |
? |
| |
Add impact on tube longevity:
|
? |
Notes & qualifications: Cost
through tube damage is a long term consideration. Material
and labour costs for re-tubing are high, but the biggest cost
in such circumstances is down time. Contractor charges for
pig decoking can significantly reduce when carried out during
multiple heater operations. As the Contractor’s biggest
cost is mobilisation, a second and third heater decoked in
the same maintenance visit can produce reductions making the
unit charge attractively less. Outside North America &
Europe, Contractor costs are likely to be higher in order
to incorporate additional mobilisation and other costs.
In a long shutdown planned to take weeks, it can be argued
that such a circumstance will not gain in any way from saved
time through faster & more efficient decoking. Yet a pig
decoke will still clean efficiently, quickly and with proper
measurement. The tube damage associated with a steam air decoke
is avoided, and the Client is left with a clean heater after
a predictable, safe and trouble free decoking experience.
If
the cost case is made for a pig decoke – then why cokebuster
pigging?
Hidden & consequential costs
are clearly reduced, as follows:
1. Quality of the decoking.
Although pig decoking grew in popularity through the 1990s
as a beneficial replacement of Steam Air Decoking (& other
methods), its scientific development then stagnated. Through
new investment and scientific advance, the cokebuster pig
now changes that. Not only the new cokebuster pig, but the
whole concept of service with complete package of pigs
+ measurement technology + advanced machinery + quality personnel
through training and experience……. ……this
produces a proven new departure from ordinary pig decoking.
2. Are the tubes clean? With
tubes properly and thoroughly cleaned, the heater can simply
be put back into service with a confident expectation of the
fullest run length. The degree to which tubes are clean can
be scientifically measured and such measurement promptly displayed
for refinery engineers to consider. Recorded measurements
can be used time after time for ongoing management of the
heater.
3. Are the tubes damaged? With cokebusters
– no. One of our representatives will be pleased to
arrange a visit and closely discuss all aspects of our technology.
With undamaged tubes, the heater remains in service longer,
it refines more efficiently, and has increased longevity in
its lifetime’s service.
4. Management & Safety. Your regional
cokebusters provider is commercially part of the whole enterprise.
He is not a Franchise looking only for his commission, but
he is a committed individual who has every commercial and
genuine reason to offer his Clients the total care package.
Representatives visiting Client sites have direct access to
the most senior management levels, matched only by their similar
direct access to the hands-on personnel who will later conduct
the site operation. It is not just a slogan to say this is
“World Class Technology – locally delivered.”
5. Environment – a different kind
of cost.
Financial penalties have been levied against refineries for
exceeding acceptable emission levels through use of the steam
air decoking procedure. The United States Department of Energy
& Office of Industrial Technologies commissioned a treatise
focusing on the Petroleum Refining Industry in order to clarify
the varieties of refining processes, at the same time identifying
environmental impacts of the Industry. In a thorough and wide
ranging analysis containing 124 pages, the treatise examines
in detail all refining processes and draws on technical studies
to produce a definitive appraisal of production practices
along with associated control and measurement of emissions.
Some enormous figures clearly identify
the size of this global pollution issue:-
“Per year, carbon & carbon equivalent emissions
in excess of 60 million metric tonnes, as well as in excess
of 34,000 metric tonnes of toxic chemicals, are produced by
the Petroleum Refining Industry”
“A large source of air emissions is process heaters
and boilers (CO, SOx, NOx). In addition, some processes create
considerable amounts of particulate and other emissions from
catalyst regeneration or decoking processes”
With cokebusters pigging, removed coke automatically
passes through on-board primary & secondary filtration.
From the last 4 pass visbreaker we decoked, the Client was
left with over 10 tonnes of coke solids. It’s his coke
– we left it there!
|